Wednesday, September 30, 2009

The Subtler Pleasures of Martha Quest

BY ASHLEY BLUNT

In theory, the works of the winner of the Nobel Prize for Literature in any given year should represent the epitome of storytelling -- in essence, writing containing in depth thought and analysis of the human condition, addressing societal issues and the essence of human experience in a lasting way. But the reality is that in many cases, Nobel Prize authors are so highbrow, so advanced and complicated in their use of language and manner of storytelling, that for the average reader the story is lost and the work loses all value.

In 2007, the literary recipient of the Nobel Prize was a woman named Doris Lessing, who the Nobel committee describes as "that epicist of the female experience, who with scepticism, fire and visionary power has subjected a divided civilisation to scrutiny." Lessing is an old, old woman, turning ninety this year. She is so old, in fact, that she was born in "Persia," which can't be located on the globe today as it's now Iran. Many of the works which made her famous were published in the 1950s. So what value can she have to today's readers? If we accept the Nobel committee's advice and try to slog through one of her works, will we find ourselves drowning in a swamp of incomprehensibility? And if we can understand her story, will we be able to relate it to our lives at all?

Take the unfortunately titled Martha Quest, randomly. First published in 1952, it is a novel centered around a young girl named, predictably, Martha Quest, and set in "1939, in the capital of a British colony in the centre of the great African continent;" for some reason, Lessing chooses not to inform us which particular country, although we can guess that it may be Rhodesia, based on a reference to Cecil Rhodes buried deep within the novel.

What makes Martha Quest endearing is its readability: the language is straightforward and direct, allowing us to lose ourselves in the setting. Lessing quickly establishes Martha as a teenager growing up in the countryside, and makes it plain that whether her character is in the heart of African or on the prairie in Saskatchewan, she is bored, tired of her parents, tired of her supposed friends, and tired of studying for exams that she sees as pointless. This familiarity unites us the story despite the foreign setting, and we're willing to give Martha a chance. She rewards us by leaving the farm and taking a job "in town," which she discovers she is terribly unqualified for, and yet manages to stick with.

The novel transforms itself as a reflection of her life. Where there were long, descriptive passages of the country, where it seemed nothing had moved for a hundred years, now there is fast-paced dialogue, split-second decisions, and new characters every few pages. It seems the youth of town are frantic in their absorption of life, working through the day in their civil servant or secretarial positions (depending, of course, on their respective genders), to then obessively fill their evenings with trips to the movies, the local hotel restaurant and bar, the sports club and finally the bar, where they urge each other to remain dancing and drinking until the sun comes up, so they can finally go home, bathe, and return to work. They never sleep. With the ripples of war encircling the globe, there seems to be some unconscious knowledge among the young that they must live their lives now.

Martha, though, the voice of Lessing, finds it all "disgusting." She cannot ignore the ill treatment of the natives, the anti-Semitism, the nonchalant attitude toward the approaching war. And what particularly disgusts her is marriage, and that marriage always leads to children, these tiny demanding creatures who destroy the lives of women. And so she goes through the motions with all the other youth, despising most of them, sometimes out loud, dates a Jewish man only to find that it ostracizes her completely, and decides she does not care, even though she does not care for the man either, and breaks up with him. She joins a leftist book club and is warned that she will be arrested, but quits it only because she finds the people pretentious and pathetic. She argues with people based on facts, and becomes enraged because they are "not only inconsistent, but don't mind being inconsistent."

But then, as is inevitable, Martha marries: like all the other woman she despises, she meets someone and marries him within ten days; she does not even love him, or like him consistently, and it seems she only marries him because he is different from the other "boys" of the sports club scene. And here the book ends: it is part of a series which is based on Lessing's own life, so we can assume in the following books Martha will be divorced and remarried, have some number of children, and move to England as was always her dream, just as Lessing did. But the point remains: Martha Quest is not only readable, comprehensible, and at points even enjoyable, it is a story which bridges generations and continents, which could be retold almost word for word in the context of this year, this city. Much like Pearl Buck, Doris Lessing is a excellent starting point for readers wishing to explore the heights of the Nobel Prize laureates.

Monday, September 28, 2009

Examining the FlashFoward Pilot

Is it worth watching another show every week?

BY COLIN ENQUIST

With all the hype built around FlashForward, how could I not watch the series premiere? 12.46 million viewers must have though the same thing! Plus the series is produced and co-created by David S. Goyer (The Unborn), who I adore. Goyer even wrote and directed the pilot episode. The series premiere of FlashForward fell on September 24th, 2009 (more on this date a little later!).

If you have been living in a media free world for the past couple of months or just ignored the constant push by ABC then I will quickly lay out the premise for you.

A mysterious global event causes everyone on the planet to simultaneously lose consciousness for 137 seconds. Many people worldwide see what appear to be visions of their lives six months (April 29th, 2010 to be specific) in the future. The event causes great catastrophe across the globe due to people blacking out while driving cars, airplanes or any other form of mechanical machinery that could kill someone if it were being run by a unconcious person behind the controls, while the people who survived are left wondering if what they saw will actually happen.

It seems the main protagonist will be Mark Bedford (Joseph Fiennes), a Los Angeles FBI Agent now tasked with leading the team to solve the mystery about the global event causing every person to black out. I am not going to even mention the rest of the large ensemble cast that has been put together because we have yet to even see many of the actors/actresses actually in the show.

Despite the show being billed as the next Lost, I never really expected the pilot to be so similar. The first 15 minutes are almost the same as the pilot to Lost. It opens with Mark Bedford, waking up, confused. Quickly we flash back to hours before, giving us a brief explanation of what Bedford has just gone through. Once we catch up to where we started, Bedford is helping innocents that have been injured. After a few more similarities the show takes off in its own direction. The creators of the show like Lost and if you were paying attention you would have noticed the Oceanic billboard (picture to your left!) in the background of one scene. I had to go back later to read what the sign actually said, “Perfect Safety Record”. The characters from Lost probably got a kick out of that!

I was not attached emotionally yet to any of the characters introduced during the first 35 minutes of the show and it felt like the show was just planning on laying out the global event without working any emotion into the show until further episodes. Of course that ending with Bedford and his daughter Charlie (Lennon Wynn) sitting on the swings tossed what I thought was going to be the weakness of the pilot out of the window. When Charlie handed her father a friendship bracelet, it hit me pretty hard. That one scene asks the big question about the visions themselves. Are they a self-fulfilling prophecy?

From wikipedia.com

A self-fulfilling prophecy is a prediction that directly or indirectly causes itself to become true, by the very terms of the prophecy itself, due to positive feedback between belief and behavior. Although examples of such prophecies can be found in literature as far back as ancient Greece and ancient India, it is 20th-century sociologist Robert K. Merton who is credited with coining the expression "self-fulfilling prophecy" and formalizing its structure and consequences. In his book Social Theory and Social Structure, Merton gives as a feature of the self-fulfilling prophecy: Ie: when Roxanna falsely believes that her marriage will fail and fears such failure will occur that it actually causes the marriage to fail.

The self-fulfilling prophecy is, in the beginning, a false definition of the situation evoking a new behaviour which makes the original false conception come 'true'. This specious validity of the self-fulfilling prophecy perpetuates a reign of error. For the prophet will cite the actual course of events as proof that he was right from the very beginning.

In other words, a prophecy declared as truth when it is actually false may sufficiently influence people, either through fear or logical confusion, so that their reactions ultimately fulfill the once-false prophecy.


This could be one of the main themes surrounding the series, fate vs. free will. Can you change your future? This reminded me of a fable one of my teachers used to tell in class. The old fable deals with a self-fulfilling prophecy.

A man goes out to the marketplace in Mecca and encounters Death, who clearly recognizes him and gives him a meaningful look. The guy is sure that Death is soon going to come claim him, so he gets the fastest camels he can find and makes an all-day and all-night journey to Samarra. After his arrival, Death encounters him on the street and claims his life. "But," the man says, "I saw you in Mecca yesterday and was sure you would claim me there." "Yes, I was very puzzled by that meeting," says Death, "because Fate had decreed that I take you today in Samarra and I didn't see how that would be possible with you in Mecca yesterday."

Like any good show many questions were asked in this first episode to get you to stick around for the answer. While I do not expect any of these to be revelations we find out about anytime soon, some of the questions were very interesting.Fellow FBI Agent Demetri Noh (John Cho) doesn’t have a vision; he seems to think it is because he will be dead in 6 months. I do not buy that, it was proved at the end that someone did not black out, maybe he was conscious? It would explain how he got so far away from the car before Bedford found him. The biggest question would be the cliff-hanger ending. Who is the man at Comerica Park and why did he stay conscious?

I will stick around for a couple more episodes at least but I would like to feel more emotionally involved with the characters. The premise of the show is captivating; it won’t keep me around just based on that though. Premiering on 9/24, the show seems to be considered in real time as the event prophesizes something to do with 4/29 in 2010. Does this mean the season finale is that day? I am intrigued by the prospect of a show basing events on a current timeline. Also 9/24 flipped is 4/29, am I looking into this a little much? What did you think about the show?

Friday, September 25, 2009

Ponyo is Magical

Although it is just an eco friendly version of Pinocchio

BY COLIN ENQUIST

Hayao Miyazaki is a legend in Japanese cinema. He has even seen some mild success over in North America with Princess Mononoke, Spirited Away and Howl’s Moving Castle. The latest animated adventure from the mind of Miyazaki took Japan by storm in 2008, winning several awards, including the Japan Academy Prize for Animation of the Year. Studio Ghibli brings Ponyo to the American shore with the help of Walt Disney Pictures, John Lasseter and a stellar voice cast of Cate Blanchett, Noah Cyrus, Matt Damon, Frankie Jonas, Tina Fey and Liam Neeson.

At the heart of the film is Sōsuke, a mature 5 years old, who finds a goldfish in the sea which he dubs Ponyo. It turns out Ponyo is not a normal fish. Quickly Ponyo and Sōsuke form a friendship. Ponyo decides that she wants to become a real girl. The transformation of Ponyo happens early in the film but Ponyo does not understand (and neither do we) the forces she has unleased upon the world. This is truly where the adventure begins.

Miyazaki and his team of artists bring us into a very magical world. The water colour-esque artistry used for the backdrop is absolutely stunning. This is one thing that animted CGI films lack. With the animators putting so much focus on the CGI characters (and these characters usually look fantastic) the backdrops suffer and don’t visually pop with emotion like a hand drawn film does. Obviously some exceptions do come along but for the most part I will take the animation of Ponyo over something done on a computer (I am not saying computer animators do not work hard, just stating my preferance).

Ponyo follows along the usual Miyazaki themes. Like most of his other films, enviromentilsm is the most prominent. The characters are shown gazing at the beauty of the sea that surrounds them. Out of sight, out of mind, they do not realize the pollution under the surface. Only admiring the beauty of what can be seen, ignoring the truth. They must understand it to some extant though, as I have never witnessed a film show so prominently a character repeatedly shutting off the lights after he (or she) leaves a room.

A few things did bother me. One being the love story told about two 5 year olds seemed a little far fetched. It was not the love aspect but rather the depth and understanding Sōsuke and Ponyo seemed to have of love.

The audience is suppose to take everything in this film at face value. Never giving us many reasons of why the sea got angry. Some of these questions could have been cut out of the North American release of the film. Many times imports lose a few scenes due to translation problems and I am hoping that is the case and the DVD version will have a subtitled version of the film along with the English dubbing.

Miyazaki’s newest film may not be his best and is probably his weakest endevour that I have seen but it is a very artistic tale about innocence and love. You may want to wait for a subtitled version (I am under the assumption that it would be better because they normally are) even though the new voice cast does extremely well. I would not tell you to skip this film, I actually recommend seeing it, but there is no need to rush out and see it like I did.

3 out of 5

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

WTF Book of the Month: Beat the Reaper

Apparently that oath to do no harm is more like a suggestion!

BY LAURA GIES

I'm a vampire junkie. I can admit it. I think I first got hooked on Christopher Pike's The Last Vampire series, and I've worked my way through both Buffy and Angel. I've read Anne Rice, Laurell K. Hamilton, Charlaine Harris, and a whole slew of minor unknown's. I suppose I'm more of a supernatural junkie, I love anything with werewolves, faeries, if it's not human, I'll give it a go. However, I also love reading, and I'm depleting the good supernatural authors (and several of the bad ones) faster than they can be printed, and my book shelf is all of a certain theme, so I've been attempting to broaden my horizons.

To this end, anytime anyone recommends a book, or I overhear a conversation about a book, or I see a book mentioned on a show or movie that is outside of my normal reading bubble, I request it from the library. I've had up to the maximum number of requests on more than one occasion (I think it's 27), and my record for books taken out from the library at one time is 15. That's this week. My librarian knows me by name and is getting back strain from all the books I'm making her carry, but she's a good sport. As you can imagine, this technique has lead me to read a much wider variety of books, and some of them are either so awesome or so awful as to blow my mind. Which brings me to the topic of my post, the "WTF Book of the Month." This will be my regular feature (I hope!) and trust me, there are plenty to choose from. I promise this will be the last post with a giant introduction!

This month's selection is Beat the Reaper by Josh Bazell.

Best WTF moment of the book: AN unarmed, naked Peter Brown (aka: Pietro "Bearclaw" Brwna), cuts open his own leg and removes his fibula to use as a knife against his attackers. From the mouth of the narrator, "so I shove my fingers through the membrane that runs between the fibula and the tibia, and grab hold oft he bone...And now I need to break it. Ideally without wrecking my ankle or knee (393, Large Print Ed., Little, Brown & Co., New York, NY., 2009)."

Pietro Brwna was living a relatively normal life with his grandparents in West Orange until he came home one day to find his grandparents murdered when he was 14. Pietro became obsessed with finding their killers, and learns that they were murdered so a couple of guys could "get made" in the mob. He befriends "Skinflick" Locano, the son of a made mob lawyer, and through his connections becomes a mob assassin, and kills the two men responsible. He only kills really bad guys, though.

Of course, all of that is back story. In the here and now, Pietro has entered the Witness Protection Program and is now Peter Brown (because the Program is very creative), an intern in the worst hospital ever. In this first person narrative, we follow along as Peter fends off a would-be mugger, disposes of a gun in the hospital, goes on his rounds, attempts to treat patients and self medicates, and that's before his day starts going downhill. On his rounds he is recognized by a patient from his old life, and has to do whatever he can to avoid the mob guys that come gunning for him.

Bazell, the author, moves seamlessly back and forth between time frames, as comfortable in Peter's memories of the past as he is in the present day. The reader picks up on Peter's exhaustion as he moves through his night shift, his frustration when the life he's been leading is forced back into his past. Despite the fact that he is a mob hitman, you feel sympathy for Peter and you want him to succeed, rooting for him the whole way.

Beat the Reaper is not my usual reading fare, but this fast-paced breakout novel for Josh Bazell has me chomping hoping he isn't a one-trick pony.

4 out of 5

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Is FlashForward the Next Lost?

That is what ABC is counting on

BY COLIN ENQUIST

With ABC ending the cult phenomenon Lost in its 6th season this upcoming year, they will need to fill the void left from Lost's enormous ratings every week. ABC is hoping that FlashForward does just that. The show is based off of the Canadian science fiction writer’s 1999 Prix-Aurora Award winning novel of the same name written by Robert J. Sawyer. Starting on September 24th in the Thursday evening time slot, at 8:00 p.m. Eastern / 7:00 p.m. Central.

The cast is large and quite good, Joseph Fiennes (The Escapists), John Cho (Star Trek), Jack Davenport (Swingtown), Zachary Knighton (The Hitcher), Peyton List (Big Shots), Brían F. O'Byrne (Doubt), Gabrielle Union (Deliver Us From Eva), Courtney B. Vance (Law & Order: Criminal Intent) , Christine Woods and Adam Tsekhman, round out the stellar ensemble cast. Sonya Walger and Dominic Monaghan seemed to have been poached directly from Lost to bring some familiarity with the cast to new viewers, I am sure ABC is hoping that these familiar faces bring in a good chunk of the Lost crowd. The pilot was written by David S. Goyer (The Unborn) (who also directed) and Brannon Braga (24).

A mysterious global event causes everyone to simultaneously experience, for two minutes and seventeen seconds, his or her life six months in the future. When it is over, many are dead in accidents involving vehicles, aircraft, and any other device needing human control. Everyone who survived is left wondering if what they saw will actually happen. A Los Angeles FBI agent named Mark Benford (Joseph Fiennes) tries to figure out what exactly happened and why it happened. Along with his team, he creates a database of people's flash forwards from around the world called the Mosaic Collective (for which a website has been launched).


Looks and sounds interesting. It really feels like it could fill the empty space that will be in my TV schedule when Lost finally departs. Unlike Lost though, I will be watching this show from the start, not having to cram 5 seasons in one summer will be a big relief! Tune in on September 24th, 2009 and watch FlashForward, maybe you will be watching the next hit TV series. Maybe not though, only time will tell.

Friday, September 18, 2009

Paranormal Activity the Scariest Movie Ever?

No idea, but it sure looks like it could be!

BY COLIN ENQUIST

The Exorcist, Alien, It, The Shining, Psycho may hold that title on some lists floating around the internet but it sounds like a new film could perch itself on top of a few of those lists. That film is Paranormal Activity. Yes I could be saying a bit much since the film has not officially been released and I am basing this solely off of what I have read, heard and witnessed in the trailer (which is below) because I have yet to see it as well.

Director Oren Peli wrote and directed this low-budget horror film. It is his debut film, made on a shoestring budget of $11, 000. Paramount Pictures is getting creative for the release of the film, screening it Sept. 24th for free in select cities at midnight while the film debuts at Austin’s Fantastic Fest when the clock strikes twelve. The studio has also created a Demand It widget where if the film is not playing in your city, you can “demand” that it does. The film is drawing comparisons to the Blair Witch Project from those who have seen it.

Check out the trailer for this supernatural thriller. You might want to leave the lights on! Tell me what you thought of the trailer.


Below is the lucky cities that are getting the free midnight screenings. If the film is not playing in your town, DEMAND IT HERE!

Austin (Alamo Draft House)
Seattle (Neptune)
Ann Arbor, Michigan (State)
Durham, North Carolina (Southpoint 16)
Baton Rouge, Louisiana (RAVE Mall of Louisiana 15)
Boulder, Colorado (Cinemark 16)
Columbus, Ohio (Studio 35)
Orlando, Florida (AMC Universal Cineplex)
Madison, Wisconsin (Marcus Eastgate 16)
Santa Cruz, California (Del Mar 3)
State College, Pennsylvania (Premiere College 9)
Tucson, Arizona (El Con)
Lincoln, Nebraska (Ross Media Center)

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Wizards of Waverly Place

The Movie!

By MATTHEW LUECKE

I have a six year old son which means I don’t get out much. When I do watch a movie, it’s not Inglorious Basterds or The Time Traveler’s Wife. It is Cars, Wall*E or The Hannah Montana Movie. Thus, my “summer” movie for this year was the Disney Channel premier of Wizards of Waverly Place: The Movie.

Why should you care? Well, it was the second most watched Disney movie of all time, behind only High School Musical 2: Musicalier. (This franchise even has an ice show!) Eleven million people tuned in for the premier, including Yours Truly.

The premise of the series: a wizard (“Jerry Russo”) falls in love with a mortal (“Theresa”), has to give up his powers, and raises 3 teenage kids (“Justin,” “Alex,” and “Max”), who are wizards in training. Eventually, the kids will be in some sort of contest to determine which of them will become the family wizard while the other two lose their powers forever. The set-up for the movie is that the family goes on vacation to a Caribbean Island where their parents met, noted for famous magic/wizard stuff.

Let me start by saying, I like this show, and I like this movie. But, there are plot holes a truck could drive through. For instance, Justin’s (David Henrie) best friend “Zeke” is referred to as “Zack” for an entire episode. Sometimes Jerry (David Deluise) is aware of magic related stuff other mortals aren’t and sometimes he isn’t. There are spells and magic objects that do the exact same thing, but only referred to in different episodes. In the movie, Alex (Selena Gomez) and her mother (Maria Canals Barrera) have mother-daughter problems as set-up for the movie; but they’ve never had any of these problems in the show.

Because of these problems, Alex, while holding the family’s magic wand (1st time mentioned) and The Book of Forbidden Spells (1st time mentioned) wishes her parents never met. Reality goes all squiggly and the parents don’t know each other and don’t know the kids. The kids have to figure out a way to reverse Alex’s spell before they disappear (not Back to the Future disappear, but Twister disappear). So, Alex and Justin go on a quest to find the Stone of Dreams, which grants any wizard one wish. Hi-jinks ensue, including being thwarted by a wizard-turned-into-a-parrot and the early commencement of the family wizard contest between Justin and Alex only because Max (Jake T. Austin) has already disappeared.

Why does the movie work? For the same reason the show works so well: David Henrie and Selena Gomez have such amazing chemistry together. They are as good as a combo as I have ever seen act together, and I have watched a lot of TV. The show started getting really good when the powers that be recognized the chemistry. The movie wisely spent a good deal of time focusing on Alex and Justin. The special effects are much better for the movie, especially during the rock levitating scene (they have to cross a large canyon). But the interaction between Alex and Justin and how they resolve their brother/sister issues makes the show and movie worthwhile. Overall, I would score the movie a 7 out of 10. But, the plot holes reduce it to a 5 or 5.5.

Monday, September 14, 2009

DVD Pick: Across the Universe

Love, Rock n Roll and Revolution!

BY COLIN ENQUIST

Across the Universe is a rock opera based entirely off songs written by The Beatles. The film is directed by Julia Taymor who also got a writing credit for the film. She is the genius behind the outstanding musical The Lion King which won her a Tony Award (the first woman to do so in the category) for directing the musical. The film stars Jim Sturgess, Evan Rachel Wood, Joe Anderson and T.V. Carpio. Cameo appearances from Bono, Eddie Izzard, Joe Crocker, Salma Hayek and others are sprinkled throughout the film.

The story is very disjointed and is tough to follow but is not impossible. Following several characters, the tale leads us from early in the 1960s to the later turbulent times of the Vietnam War in the late 1960s. At heart the film is a love story, from beginning to end, but it strays because of the abundance of characters. As the story shifts to each character it loses some of its perspective, almost being forced in another direction just to use a specific song in the vast library of The Beatles. Jude (Jim Sturgess) the love torn artist, Lucy (Evan Rachel Wood) the budding revolutionist, Max (Joe Anderson) the one being drafted for war, not to mention the musicians Sadie (Dana Fuchs) and Jojo (Martin Luther McCoy) (who resemble Janis Joplin and Jimmi Hendrix), each are uniquely interesting. All their sagas are intertwined but if Taymor had trimmed down some of the side plots the story could have flowed more fluently. Making us focus more on the romance budding between Jude and Lucy which is the main story being told in the film. Sturgess even opens the film singing “Girl”, describing a girl (who turns out is Lucy) which he loves, but he has many uncertainties about her.

Love may be the heart of the film but The Beatles songs are essentially the centerpiece of it. Incorporating 33 of The Beatles songs throughout the entire film, Taymor has created a soundtrack that is the film itself. Not only does the film use The Beatles songs to base the story off of, but it uses references throughout the entire film. I probably missed some myself, the ones easily noticeable were that most characters names were somehow related to a song written by The Beatles, Jude doing a drawing of an apple (The Beatles record label), some were not so obvious (Max holding his silver hammer!) and I was happy to catch them. Surely I missed many and if I watch the film again maybe I can detect the ones I missed the first time around. The musical aspect is not just used as a prop though, with commentary in the lyrics supporting the dialogue and path the story is moving in.

Taymor uses stylish choreography for the few dance numbers. The stand out would be when Max is going through his physical before being shipped off to Vietnam.

This film is worth watching if you enjoy musicals or are a fan of The Beatles. The disorganized story makes this film lacking where Grease or West Side Story excelled. I would never consider Across the Universe to be one of the greatest musicals but it is a fun film that you will love to sing to. You may find yourself heading down to your local Best Buy or onto the iTunes store to purchase the soundtrack so you can sing along with the cast anytime you want. I know I did! One song is now my ring tone as well!

3 out of 5

Friday, September 11, 2009

A 500 Day Journey of Life After Love

But how long till you find happiness again?

BY COLIN ENQUIST

(500) Days of summer
is an offbeat romantic comedy directed by Marc Webb with a script from Scott Neustadter and Michael H. Weber. Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Zooey Deschanel play the couple, which really is not a couple, in the film. Presented in a non-linear format, each scene is established by what day of the 500 days it is. As the tagline states: This is not a love story. This is a story about love.

Right from the get go we are told about the break up between our two lovers. Through a voice over, which is at times too much, we find out how the two met. Instantly Tom (Gordon-Levitt) falls in love with Summer (Deschanel) but Tom makes Summer into something she is not. As we view the story (from Tom’s point of view) we realize that Summer is very basic, bland but to Tom very attractive, fun and exciting. The reason Summer requires more depth for her character is not the writers fault, but that is the way Tom perceives her. Limiting his view of Summer to only the good times points his mind in the direction of thinking he can change her into something she does not want to be.

The soundtrack was oddly different, really playing off the characters musical tastes, The Smiths was prominent in several scenes. Brit pop was the music used mainly throughout the film and almost every musician the couple talked about was featured; only Ringo Starr music seemed to be missing from the soundtrack but I could have just missed it.

Clichés hurt the film though. It is hard to get away from them but for the most part the filmmakers did. Almost cliché free until the ending. Introducing a new love interest for Tom, a woman whose name is Autumn (Minka Kelly), who he meets at a job interview, received some groans from the audience but it did get some laughs. The use of a younger sibling (Chloe Moretz) to play physiatrist is nothing new. I would really like to meet these intelligent young people who seem to always know more than the protagonists “adult” friends.

Some great scenes really construct (500) Days of Summer into a distinctive romantic comedy. A work party where karaoke is sung really shows Tom’s love for Summer start to truly blossom. This leads to possibly the best scene in the movie, where Tom, Summer and Tom’s best friend McKenzie (played by Geoffrey Arend) discuss each others different feelings about love and how it is portrayed in our society.

Webb, who got his start on music videos, brings a unique vision to the film. The out of nowhere dance number works and shows the fun Tom was having. Quickly he segues over to another day where Tom is feeling the opposite because of the same reason, Summer. Webb uses a uncommon practice in film, showing the same sequence happen from different perspectives. In this case though, not from two different characters but only Tom’s perspective, we just his expectations and reality of what is actually happening.

Love is fun, except when it hurts. This is a breath of fresh air with the film’s honest approach to a love story. The movie reminds me of Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind and if you enjoyed that film this may be up your alley. It would advise putting this on your Netflix queue if it is not playing in your local theatre.

4 out of 5

Thursday, September 10, 2009

If You Don't Like This Movie Then You're An @$$hole!: 002

From Dusk Till Dawn

BY GEORGE CAVALENES

Starring George Clooney, Havey keitel, and Juliette Lewis, this crime thriller/ B-horror movie never lets me down no matter how many times I see it. It's written by Quentin Tarentino and directed by Robert Rodriguez, two of my favorite people making movies today(if you don't include spy kids).


Nine Reasons Why This Movie is Great:

1. Quentin Tarentino plays one the creepiest guys in the history of film. He nailed it. He played creepy-rapist-sociopath-murder so well it makes me wonder just how much experiance he has at all those things.


2. The "Cloon". The guy is just badass. He does Tarentino dialogue so well! Why haven't they worked together again? Tell me!

3. What kind of testosterone driven male would I be if i failed to mention Salma Hayek? She does a sexy striptease, without the stripping, whilst holding a snake around her neck. Hot.

4. Sex machine. A biker played by Tom Savini with a pistol for a penis.

5. The opening scene to the movie. With Tarention and Rodriguez showing off their ability to create tenion and the "cloon" doing his thing, this is one of my favorite scenes in all of movies.

6. The face melting is very reminicant of Indiana Jones: The Last Crusade. If you don't know what I'm talking about then you need to rewatch that movie. Jesus was a carpenter.

7. Super Soakers and condoms full of holy water. A jack hammer with a stake at the end of it. All the weapons in the movie are very satirical and yet very appropriate. They fit the mood of the movie and make it humorous all at the same time.

8. Cheech Marin playing 3 very different characters. Everytime he shows up you should be laughing. He is the border cop, the door/hype man at the Tittie Twister, and the guy that the Gecko brothers are there to meet.

9. Ernest Liu. Some of the worst acting I've ever seen and yet...I love it so much.

If you can't get down with this movie, than I can't get down with you. It's not a slice of life, thought provoking gorgeous peice of film, but it's fun and entertaining and if you don't like it then you're an asshole.

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Short Film of the Month: 9 (September 2009)

Acker's short film 9 lost the Oscar, but gained a fan in Hollywood heavyweight Tim Burton

Director: Shane Acker
Writer: Shane Acker
Distributor: UCLA's Animation Workshop
Year of Release: 2005
Running Time: 10:39

Synopsis: Shane Acker's Oscar-nominated computer animated short film tells the story of a sentient rag doll called '9', who is the last of his breed in a parallel world that is absent of humankind. In fact, the only other visible entity is a relentless mechanical monster known as "the Cat Beast," which had already killed the first eight of the rag doll species, and is set on taking down '9' and its soul. This voiceless (music by Eric Olsen) short caught the attention of Tim Burton and Focus Features, who extended the story into a $33 million feature film that hits theatres today.

Tarantino tackles Hitler in 'Inglourious Basterds'

Dirty deeds are done dirt cheap, but notoriety comes at a hefty price

BY EMIL TIEDEMANN

"It was a ridiculous movie," blasted Brad Pitt when German magazine Stern recently asked his opinion of Tom Cruise's Hitler-era feature Valkyrie. "The Second World War could still deliver more stories and films, but I believe that Quentin put a cover on that pot," Pitt continued, this time referencing Tarantino's latest cinematic asskick Inglourious Basterds. Such blatent animosity for last year's Valkyrie may put a damper on the friendship of the Hollywood kings, but I can only assume Pitt would prefer Quentin "Aestheticizator of Violence" Tarantino in his corner than Tom "Couch Jumper" Cruise.

Enough with that Hollywood gossip shit now, let's chat about an insanely entertaining--at times--war epic as told (made-up) from the warped mindset of one of the most adventurous filmmakers of the last 20 years, Quentin Jerome Tarantino. He's the same man who resurrected tintsletown dropouts like John Travolta (Pulp Fiction) and David Carradine (Kill Bill); the same guy who dismembered Sydney Poitier et al as "Hold Tight!" by Dave Dee et al played on (Death Proof); and the same genius who transformed Michael Madsen into an ear-cutting, flesh-roasting madman (Reservoir Dogs). And now, the man tackles one of the most infamous eras of mankind, and comes out on the other side with Nazi blood on his hands.

Just when you thought we had seen every angle of WWII, Tarantino flings us back into Nazi-occupied France, though he insists that his fictionalized film is a "spaghetti western but with World War II iconography" more than anything else. Whatever category Basterds may fit squarely into, the 153-minute feature is a slick, turbulent and classy--and I use that term loosely--step back into a time when Adolph Hitler decided that he was appointed the ruler of the world and the extinguisher of all Jews.

In this alternate history of a movie Brad Pitt tries on a soldier's uniform and a Tennessee accent as the ringleader of the "arse-kicking," Nazi-killing Jewish-American squadron known as the "Basterds." They take it upon themselves to seek and destroy the swastika-branded troops of Germany's National Socialism party, using methods of mayhem that requires each warrior to bring commanding officer Aldo Raine (Pitt) 100 Nazi scalps, borrowing from the carnal procedures of the Apache Indians.

Intrigued yet?!

Meanwhile, Mèlanie Laurent is Shosanna, a Holocaust survivor who escapes Colonel Hans "Jew Hunter" Landa (Christoph Waltz) (pictured below) during a lethal interrogation of a French dairy farm. A few years have passed since she witnessed the bloodshed of her family at the hands of the strong-armed "Jew Hunter," and she's taken up refuge in the bustle of metro France, where she changed her name and now runs the very cinema that will host the upcoming Nazi propaganda film Stolz der Nation (A Nation's Pride).

Therein lies the backbone of this sometimes-savage, sometimes-elongated, most times-encompassing peek into a theatrical substitute for the truth of the demise of Hitler. Shosanna's small, but refined movie house is the one opportunity in which Hitler and his gang of senior officers will all be together under the same roof ("all our rotten eggs in one basket"), a chance for the Basterds to end the war for good, and a chance for Shosanna to retrieve the ultimate revenge for the butchery of her loved ones. But if you must know what goes down from here on in, you're gonna have to shell out the $13 and head out to your local theatre for yourself.

If you don't go check it out, your loss I guess, but don't say I didn't warn ya. Now don't get me wrong, Basterds was far from perfect. It may have stretched out longer than I had anticipated, as a couple of scenes easily couldn't been levelled, but I'm not complaining! Pitt's '40s-hick accentè took some getting used to at first, but was like music to my ears by the second hour. And being a big fan of TV's The Office, B.J. Novak (as "The Little Man") seemed far out of place, but I couldn't blame such a thing on anything but my obsession for Michael Scott & co. Other than those minor indiscrepancies, Basterds flowed like warm Nazi blood down the cold blade of a vigilante sunuvabitch, unless of course you're "The Bear Jew" (Eli Roth) (pictured above right), who prefers his trusty Louisville slugger to anything made of metal. Good stuff indeed.

"Basterds flowed like warm Nazi blood down the cold blade of a vigilante sunuvabitch"

The art of war prevails in moments of Inglourious Basterds, whether they be moments of uber intimidation (Waltz is flawless as the pipe-smoking, milk-drinking linguistics Nazi), momentous retribution (the white man samples the scalping rituals of Native-American warfare), or insidious betrayal (Diane Kruger (pictured below) is ravishing as a German movie starlet who answers to the French instead). All such moments are aspersed throughout the Samuel L. Jackson-narrated feature, which borrowed inspiration from Enzo Castellari's Italian war film The Inglorious Bastards (1978), though this current spin is no remake.

Then there's the music. Tarantino has become famous for his throwback to "classics" and obscure ditties that never made the rounds of the radio airwaves, and he doesn't refrain here either, as the two and a half hours of Fascist slaughtery are delivered as so to the sounds of David Bowie, Billy Preston and Oscar-winning Italian composer Ennio Morricone, none of whom were active during the Second World War. In fact, Bowie and Preston weren't even born yet. This allowed for that progressive feel that Basterds was drenched in, not to mention extended cameos by the likes of Novak and Mike Myers (as General Ed Fenech).

So there you have it, my thoughts on Tarantino and his motley crew of Nazi assassins...a bold tale of what never was, but what a glorious afterthought, eh?! Tarantino has a way of making moviegoers crave what they would never wish upon their worst enemies, and he gives it a spin that tests aged and current formulas of filmmaking until they interweave into an audacious cloak of cult-status bliss. "With Basterds, everything that can be said to this genre has been said," Pitt revealed in that aforementioned interview with Stern. "The film destroys every symbol. The work is done, end of story." Yeah, what he said.

4/ 5 stars

Inglourious Basterds Trailer

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

An Alien Palm Pilot?

Brings us thoughts that I agree with!

BY COLIN ENQUIST

I was walking home from getting a slurpee the other day and found this funny looking gadget which seemed to be a sleeker version of a palm pilot. To my confusion it was covered in weird symbols that I did not quite understand. With no buttons on the device I could not figure out how to turn it on. All of a sudden the screen flickered on displaying a message.

My name is Kklahta and I am from the planet Maazal. If you found this I am either dead or have picked up on your species’ talent you call clumsiness and lost my communicator. I am unrecognizable to your species because we Maazalians can shape shift to any object, living or inanimate, so you may have walked right by me one day. My mission is to observe and report back to my world about your planet Earth.

After I finally finished freaking out that I had just found an alien palm pilot, I started reading what he thought was worthwhile to report. I found this to be one of the most interesting write-ups that Kklahta did. Agreeing with his opinions and critiques of the way our movie theatres our run, I thought I would share Kklahta’s thoughts with you. Sadly minutes after I copied the file to this very website several dozen government agents broke through my door and questioned me for hours, and topped the night off by 'confiscating' the device.

Today’s Earth Date is July 13th, 2009
Maazal Date is 3791095.

I find myself getting more annoyed with the little nuisances this puny planet seems to ignore. Items like driving slower than the posted speed limit (I can not imagine what would happen if someone tried this on the Intergalactic Arc-Speed-Highway), cutting in the many queues at earthly venues and the infinitesimal IQ levels, and those who display a disconcerting lack of common sense. Any of these things would get you vaporized or eaten on many planets part of the Unity Galactica Union.

After I had a horrible experience watching a so called “movie”, my fellow compatriots at work said I went to the wrong place. Apparently I went to the wrong theatre; they tell me there is a better one only blocks in the other direction from my current dwelling. I complained about the dreaded line of humans and they told me something I was not aware of, you could purchase your tickets on the interweb to avoid the dreadful line up. So this is me giving them one more chance to find out if I like this favourite human past time.

The first film I saw was called Monsters vs. Aliens. I could not believe how the humans thought other world’s creatures looked. So many forms of racism towards over a dozen worlds are littered throughout the movie. Not to mention that if those monsters were supposed to be scary then I hope they never run into a Lipideeas monster from the Hunkiuk planets. So I decided to see a film more along the lines of what humans experienced early in their lifetime. The title of the film I decided upon was Year One.

Like I was told, I purchased my ticket online and printed out a little bar code onto a giant sheet of paper. Why they must use so much paper for a tiny bar code is very confusing. As I arrive at the big building with massive car parkade (they really need to invest in shrinking technology that is used out in the Svetlor sectors) I pass by some young Earth beings that seem to be inhaling something from a tiny white paper pencil. The aroma is intoxicating. I refrain from going over and taking the item from their feeble fingers. Walking through one of the twelve doorways I laugh, stupid humans, waiting in line to purchase a ticket. I playfully mock a few as I walk towards the entrance way to theatre 7. To my dismay I am turned away. I have been lied to. The online tickets are not actually tickets at all, they just reserve your ticket, now I must backtrack to the enormous parade of people waiting and patiently linger. The good news, the human spawn that was puffing the white paper pencil is in front of me. The bad news, they leave once I take a sniff of the back of their head. Whatever they were inhaling is an aroma I should investigate for back home. Finally I get to the front of the line. The lady has trouble getting her primitive scanner to read my bar code on the printed ticket.

Now that I have finished one line I must move on to the next. This next procession is for my purchase of beverage and food. I purchase combo number 4 as it reads “best value”; sadly I am perplexed when all I get is a small drink, bag of popcorn and a little piece of candy. Honestly, I just depleted 2 hours worth of Earth money on an item that could be prepared for 1/10th of the value I just paid.

I step into the dark and desolate theatre which has the eerie stench of a sugary butter. Throwing my jacket, drink and popcorn into a seat, I find myself unable to read my magazine which I had obtained for free before entering, and I trudge back to the hallway outside the theatre. I am trying to comprehend the advertisement laced magazine they supply me with (free of charge) and I am not sure if my brain hurts because I tried to examine the publication in the dimness or it is the material itself. Maybe if I broke through the door titled “staff only”, I could force them to illuminate the theatre in which I am going to be watching the movie. Why I must sit in the dim lit room and try to read in an almost unreadable light is beyond my comprehension.

Well, I must sign off, the picture has started to move and I am being told to shut off all mobile devices. Even though I do not think it would matter, as last movie there were many devices being used during the film. Hopefully this time I will not have an Earth offspring screaming into my ears for the entire occasion.

I am currently in lawsuit with the government agents over the stolen property. Hopefully if I win the legal battle, I can share other items that Kklahta had to say. Don’t hold your breathe though, the lawyers are warning me that it is going to be a long drawn out battle.

Monday, September 7, 2009

Comics Primer

Hello, My Name is George and I'm a Marvel Zombie.

BY GEORGE CAVALENS

I was born in the early 80's so my introduction to comics, like most people born then, was the 90's X-men cartoon(1992). I'm not sure if Marvel made a concerted effort back then to market to tweenies but it worked on me. At first, I didn't even know comics existed. My first comic that I can remember buying with my own money was Darker Image # 1 (and only one, march 1993). That was it for me. For the next 15 years I was reading Marvel and Image books. Of course I dropped in and out of comics (After all, I had hundreds of worthless Wetworks and Heroes Reborn comics). When comics crashed, so did I.

I started playing in bands and drinking beer. Comics were the last thing on my mind. Then something happened. I started hearing about this guy Brian Michael Bendis. At the time, Ultimate Spider-Man (oct. 2000) had just come out and he was doing a book calld Powers over at Image. I came in at around issue 6 or 7 but I tracked down the back issues (this was before trades had become so popular). This is what got me back into comics. After that I was reading everything I could get my hands on. Wednesdays had become a ritual and everything was awesome. I was of course reading only Marvel and Image. The other company never interested me. And lets face it, DC had done some pretty fucked up things. In 2000, when I came back I didn't know anything about DC but now I can go back and find out stuff and I can see why I just never got intrested in it back then. But thats not what this article is about.

Now you know my history as a Marvel Zombie. In the last six months I have read a couple of DC books that i really enjoyed: Starman Omnibus 1 and 2 and Gotham Central HC vol 1. These were fucking excellent! So, I'm not against reading DC books. And now that Geoff Johns, Grant Morrison, and Greg Rucka are saving this company I may be ready to read a couple books. Every monday here on storiesinmedium.com you will get:
-Awesome comics articles
-My DC progress
-What I'm reading every week
-Reviews in 7 words or less
-Recomdations

In addition to all this, feel free to leave me recomendations on what to read with my DC "quest".
Coming up, I've got Starman Omnibus 3, Gotham Central HC vol 2, and Green Lantern: Rebirth
on my plate. Now lets get to what I read this week and some 7 words or less reviews.

SGT. Fury and His Howling Commandos by Jesse Alexander and John Paul Leon(Marvel $3.99)
Horrible story telling meets gorgeous art.

Dominic Fortune #1 by Howard Chaykin (Marvel $3.99)
1950's James Bond punches and fucks.

Ultimate Spider-man #2 by Brian Michael Bendis and David Lafuente (Marvel $3.99)
I'm Confused. I didn't read it before.

Invincible Iron Man #17 by Matt Fraction and Salvador Larroca (Marvel $2.99)
What Captain America was 2 years ago.

Irredeemable #6 by Mark Waid and Peter Krause (Boom $3.99)
Kind of creepy. Give me more.

Sweet Tooth #1 by Jeff Lemire (Vertigo $1.00)
Great! Buy it assholes!

Detective Comics #854-856 by Greg Rucka and J.H. Williams III (DC Comics $3.99)
Wow. That's art. I'm in.

Lost Dogs by Jeff Lemire (Ashtray Press $????)
Jeff knows how to make people sad.

Cat Getting Out Of A Bag and Other Observations by Jeffrey Brown (Chronicle Books $12.95)
Hilarious! Right on the money.

The Walking Dead Hardcover Vol. 4 by Robert Kirman and Charlie Adlard (Image $29.99)
Holy shit.

That's it for this week. Read Invincible Iron Man or you're and asshole!!!!!

Next week: Spider-man.

Friday, September 4, 2009

Issue One Quick Review: Days Missing

Phil Hester takes a Roddenberry idea from a napkin!

BY COLIN ENQUIST

0.99 cents for issue number one of most comics I will buy. Most of the time I actually know what I am picking up though, today I had no idea. I saw Roddenberry presents (creator of Star Trek) and Phil Hester. Figured it had to be worth my one dollar. Especially once I heard that the idea sprouted from something on a napkin.

The story for Days Missing seems basic at first. Just another apocalyptic plague ready to destroy mankind (think Ebola virus but more contagious). A little sci fi twist though and we have an immortal who seems to have been around since, well that is never explained, but before the dinosaurs roamed Earth.

A self contained story about the mystical immortal that makes days go "missing" as we find out in the issue with a flashback that describes surreal events that could have destroyed humanity but do not because of our "savoir". This unique ability to make the days vanish in our minds is not yet explained but we know he wants to save us. Phil Hester is creating a world where anything could happen (or it already did and you don't know about it!).

Art by Frazer Irving does not set the benchmark too high for the next artist to come aboard. Not entirely sure if the book will have a rotation of artists for each issue or not but next issue is drawn by Chris Burnham. Irving's art in this book is almost basic in detail but his ability to tell the story is apparent in the way he uses the panels, really having each panel play off the previous one perfectly. My main problem was the colouring did not suit my taste. The painted style has never been my thing as I feel it takes away from the art itself too much.

Possibilities are endless for this 5 issue mini series with a wide array of stories that could be created from any time in human history. Hester has my money for the next issue for sure. This one was definitely worth 0.99 cents!

4 out of 5

Thursday, September 3, 2009

If You Don't Like This Movie Then You're An @$$hole!: 001

JAWS

BY GEORGE CAVALENES


“Here's to swimmin' with bow-legged women.”

I’m sure I’m not the only drunkard who hasn’t uttered those 7 words mid soiree. On many occasions I can remember when me and my friends would break it down, get serious…say those seven words. Nostrovia! I can only think of a handful of movies that are as quoted, parodied, and ripped off as JAWS.

I remember being a kid and catching this movie after Cubs games on WGN. A movie so scary to an 11 year old that I cried my first time getting into the ocean (second and third didn’t go as well, either). Steven Spielberg redefined suspense for this movie and inspired filmmakers for decades to come.

Responsible for creating "summer blockbuster season" and most likely Shark Week, this movie was made to scare people of all ages. I'm not going to bore you with a synopsis of the film because you don't need it to want to see this movie. You should just know that Roy Scheider, Richard Dryfuss, and Robert Shaw turned in the best acting performances of their careers. You should know that this movie launched Steven Spielberg's career. Without it we wouldn't have E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial, Schindler's List, or Jurassic Park. I could go on for days about useless trivia on this movie like how Spielberg used to call the animatronic shark (bob, for you people in the know) the great white turd or that Charlton Heston was considered for the role of Chief Brody, but I'm not going to. This movie is so great that it makes me want to know useless facts about it. The point is... this is one for the best movies ever made and if you don't like it you're an asshole.

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Iron Maiden Flight 666

Up In Irons

BY GORAN SAVIC

This film covers a tour Iron Maiden embarked on in the year 2008. It covered the first leg of their tour, and a tour which they assembled an airplane to carry their gear and their crew.

The cover tells the story, 23 concerts in 45 days, over 5 continents. It was a gruelling schedule, and you can see the fatigue on the band's faces as the movie gets farther into their tour. It's not just concert footage, but what went on backstage, and other areas. You see the band on their rare days off relaxing, playing golf, or other pastimes. These kinds of movies are wonderful, as it shows


the human side to a band, that they are not just what you see when you go to see them live.


It is also quite amazing to see the difference in how certain crowds in different cities and countries react to Iron Maiden coming to their country to perform for them. Some of these places this is the first time Iron Maiden has ever performed there. It is quite moving actually, to see grown men cry after the concert is over, as some of them have stated that Iron Maiden is not just a band, but more like a religion.


The directors behind this have previous experience with Heavy Metal documentaries, with Global Metal, and Metal: A Headbangers Story the other two that they have done. Starting in Mumbai, and finishing in Toronto, this film shows us why this band is still popular to this day.


I must add that there is a 2nd disc of the entire concert itself, which I have not viewed yet. Having seen this tour last year, there isn't a rush to see this just yet. All in all, it was a nice journey through time.

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

Inglorious Basterds is Exhilarating!

Filling the fantasy of what we wish we could have done to Hitler

BY COLIN ENQUIST

Quentin Tarantino worked on the script for Inglorious Basterds for almost a decade. During that decade the exceptional filmmaker has given us: Kill Bill (Vol 1 & 2), Deathproof (part of the Grindhouse double feature with Robert Rodriguez), and a CSI: Crime Scene Investigation two part season finale (which got Tarantino an Emmy Nomination). Not only did he direct these entire but wrote them as well (with the exception of CSI which he co-wrote) and he had minor roles in a few of the films.

This revenge war film that Tarantino has repeatedly stressed is a “spaghetti western but with a World War II iconography” takes place mostly in 1944, after D-Day but before the liberation of Paris. Inglorious Basterds is set in an alternate history of the Second World War.

Like most other Tarantino films, Inglorious Basterds has a cast of movie stars from beginning to end. Some are prominent, taking central roles: Brad Pitt and Eli Roth, others get little screen time: Mike Myers and Michael Fassbender, and a few only lend their voices: Samuel L. Jackson and Harvey Keitel. Tarantino regulars are around as well but it is the new faces in Christopher Waltz and Melanie Laurent who steal the show.

Waltz was nominated (and won) the Best Actor Award at the 2009 Cannes Film Festival for his role in this film. The multi-linguistic actor displays magnificent depth and he is: pure evil, derisive, articulate, intelligent, and absurd. Aside from Waltz, most of the other actors/actresses do not have much screen time. Even the main protagonists in Pitt and Laurent have limited screen time, despite such integral parts to the story. Pitt looks like he is having too much fun as his role of commanding officer of the Basterds.

Tarantino has used extreme violence that always pushes the boundaries and this film is no exception. This is not for those with a weak stomach. It is painful to watch some of the damage done to the human body during the times of war.

Dialogue filled and driven is the heart of any Tarantino film. I have always enjoyed this aspect of his films but I think it hurt this film slightly. Not to say the film would have been better in only English dialect but the constant reading took away from the focus on character reaction to the conversation(s) occurring.

Inglorious Basterds has some very good scenes but one stood out for me. When the Nazis are watching the premiere of “Nation’s Pride” (based off of a character’s exploits in Inglorious Basterds) they are laughing at the 300 Americans dieing on film. This propaganda film makes the Nazis so happy. A little spoiler for the ending here, so skip the rest of the paragraph if you want! Yet at the climax of both films, 350 Nazis (Hitler included!) get shot, are burned alive and caught in a giant explosion, causing the same joyous feeling to come over the audience I was watching the film with. There was no shouting and laughing like the Nazis were but you could tell the reaction was emotionally the same.

I have no knowledge (and I do not think Tarantino knows either) as to why Basterds is spelled incorrectly in the title of the film. During the film though we see Brad Pitt’s character, Lt. Aldo Raine, carry a gun holding with the title written on the barrel, so maybe the title is incorrect because Lt. Raine is possibly illiterate?

This could possibly be Tarantino’s best film since Pulp Fiction. I may throw out the argument for Deathproof to be included in that conversation of best Tarantino film. A brutal film, Inglorious Basterds draws on Tarantino’s strong dialogue to drive the story. Ending with Brad Pitt finishing his “masterpiece”, which may prove to also be Tarantino’s?

4 out of 5

About Us

And what our site intends to bring to the table!


Here at StoriesinMedium.com we all love a good story. The format of how the story told is irrelevant to us: films, novels, television, comics, hell even old time radio (how can you not like listening to Orson Welles read War of the Worlds!), as long as the void in us that craves a good story is filled. So how did our love for the many different story telling art forms translate into a website, you ask?

It all started because we – Colin Enquist, Emil Tiedemann, and Goran Savic – seemingly were given the task of informing friends and family if the many films we saw were worth watching. This slowly blossomed into us sharing our thoughts and opinions on a few websites. With the progression it only seemed natural to build our own website. As we discussed the ideas we wanted to include, the suggestion came up that we should not only share our opinions and reviews of films, but should expand the site to include all the different types of media that are used to tell stories. So on January 1st 2009, StoriesinMedium.com was born.

Since the beginning our main focus has always been the film industry and it will still be the film industry but we now are giving ourselves more freedom to spotlight on other aspects of the storytelling mediums that we all enjoy. My fellow SiM writers and I want to bring you opinionated reviews of any story that we consume with our brains, eyes and ears. We also want to bring you some unique content with our original articles and musings about items that relate to any medium that piques our curiosity.

Since we started SiM in January we have done over 70 reviews, dozens of articles and many news items. While we plan on shying away from news in general, that doesn’t mean we will never post any. The news articles we post now though will be something we are excited for or something we believe you should be excited for it. Those readers who enjoyed the focus on movie posters and trailers do not worry; they will still be around, just in a little different format.

We have brought on a few more writers to help us through this transition and they will hopefully stick around for a long, long time. Make sure you welcome George Cavalenes, Matt Luecke and Ashley Kalagian as the new crop of writers next time you visit the site. I should also make special mention of Laura Gies who joined after the site was made, and has stayed with us!

All of us here at StoriesinMedium.com hope you enjoy the new direction. Let us know by commenting on the posts you like or send us an email at contact@storiesinmedium.com!!